What type of contract means neither party can sue to enforce it?

An unenforceable contract is one that, while it may have elements of a valid contract, cannot be enforced in a court of law due to some legal principle. Various reasons can render a contract unenforceable, such as if it lacks proper documentation, is not in the proper legal form, or is against public policy.

In these cases, although the contract exists and may have been agreed upon by both parties, neither party has the ability to sue to enforce the terms. This distinction is important because it highlights scenarios where a contract may be recognized as having some level of agreement or intent but, due to specific legal constraints, lacks the enforceability that a valid contract would typically have.

In contrast, a void contract is considered invalid from the outset and has no legal effect, while a voidable contract is valid until one party chooses to void it. A valid contract, on the other hand, is enforceable by both parties. The characteristics of an unenforceable contract specifically align with the idea that neither party can seek legal remedy through the courts.